🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.