How Undercover Recording Exposed a £28m Holiday Ownership Fraud

It has been described as among the biggest frauds of its type in the Britain.

In all 14 defendants have been sentenced for their role in a £28 million plot to swindle in excess of 3,500 timeshare owners.

The victims were desperate to terminate decades-old timeshare contracts and tried to find support.

Most were aged between 60 and 80. More than 500 of them lost over £10,000, and one handed over over £80,000.

Those victimized were exposed to aggressive presentations lasting up to six hours. They were out of money, holding useless fake "points" and remained trapped in costly vacation property deals they often use.

The Business Behind the Deception

The business at the centre of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted clients' cash to support the directors' lavish way of life of prestigious schooling, luxury homes and private jets.

The leader at the top of the firm, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

On Friday, his partner Nicola was among the last group to receive sentencing.

She was given a two-year long deferred imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to money laundering.

It has been a lengthy process and represents a major victory for the victims who came forward, the authorities and prosecutors.

How the Investigation Was Initiated

I first heard about SMT was in the mid-2016. I was working in the reporting team of a broadcasting service, making documentary features.

A colleague noted that his mum had taken over the use of a vacation unit in Spain and, after years of holidays, had commenced searching to exit the deal.

It should be noted how popular vacation properties had grown with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership allowed individuals to occupy the identical property each season, or trade their time slots with other owners who had properties in alternative destinations. Roughly 600,000 holiday enthusiasts accepted that option.

The early surge was accompanied by a many reports about unscrupulous sellers mis-selling investments. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The typical timeshare contract locked buyers for many years.

By 2016, those investors who had used their guaranteed place in the sun for decades were ageing, and a large proportion were looking to end their association to their timeshares.

Several had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their apartments. Others just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And some had passed away, in many cases passing on their loved ones to take over the deals - along with their annual payments and upkeep costs.

The Covert Probe Develops

This was the situation the relative had been placed. She browsed the internet for solutions and discovered SMT, a business whose online presence assured to release her from her agreement.

But, having paid a fee and scheduled a consultation with them, her relatives became suspicious.

Additional investigation uncovered many victims claiming they had paid money and got nothing from the service. In fact, they had suffered financially. A lot of it.

The reporting group commenced probing what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters operating in the timeshare resale sector.

An attorney had many grievance cases aiming to litigate against SMT.

Reporters contacted clients who had dealt with the organization and they collectively described identical situations. They assumed the company would buy their property from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were told there was no re-sale value.

Instead, they were encouraged - indeed coerced - to invest additional funds investing in "the company's points system", named after the business's umbrella group, the parent organization.

The nature of these rewards was rather ambiguous. They appeared to be a kind of currency, offering reduced-price holidays and amenities and shopping deals.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with other owners, eventually.

Paying cash at the time would lead to an eventual payoff that would offset SMT's fees and result in the property owner ahead financially, freed at last from their burdensome contract.

An unbelievable offer? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Scam'

Based on these descriptions were correct, this was a large-scale fraud.

It's what is called a "misleading sales."

Someone - here the organization - "attracts the consumer by promoting a defined offering only to then say that's not available, pushing the individual in the direction of another, inferior option.

Such practices are unlawful. Equipped with all the testimony we had gathered, we argued to secretly film one of the firm's consultations.

The process requires commitment, energy, and compelling reasons for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the information required to prove wrongdoing.

Once authorized, our small team organized a appointment with one of the company's representatives in the English town.

Posing as a potential client hoping to help his mother free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement

Walter George
Walter George

A cybersecurity expert with over a decade of experience in IT infrastructure and network monitoring, passionate about helping organizations stay secure.