Court Dismisses Rapper Drake's Legal Case Over Kendrick Lamar’s Hit Not Like Us
A judge has rejected Drake's legal claim against Universal Music Group concerning Kendrick Lamar's song the diss record.
Presiding Judge the court’s judge ruled that the rapper’s song lyrics, which claimed the artist and his associates of being "pedophiles", were "nonactionable opinion" and could not be deemed defamatory.
Drake submitted the legal action in early this year, claiming UMG, the music company representing both artists, of defamation by allowing the song to be released and promoted, stating it disseminated a "false and malicious narrative".
Drake's spokesperson stated he planned to appeal the decision. Universal Music Group said it was satisfied with the result and was looking forward to continuing its collaboration with the rapper.
Background of the Hip-Hop Feud
Not Like Us, which was first dropped in spring 2024, was widely seen as the decisive blow in an ongoing battle between the rival rappers.
It has emerged as the most successful track of the rapper’s musical journey, having won five Grammys and being one of the most-discussed moments of his Super Bowl half-time show in February.
In a detailed ruling, the judge called the dispute between the rappers "the most notorious hip-hop feud in the history of rap music".
"The artists' series of diss tracks was a 'verbal conflict' that was the focus of extensive press coverage and digital debate," the judge noted.
"Although the accusation that plaintiff is a child predator is undoubtedly a serious one, the wider backdrop of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and insulting claims hurled by both participants, would not lead the average audience to believe that 'the track' imparts verifiable facts about the claimant."
She also noted that, in an previous track, the artist had "challenged Lamar to make the paedophilia accusations" that featured in the diss record.
On the song Taylor Made Freestyle, the rapper used the synthetic vocals of the late rapper to give Lamar advice on how to prevail in the feud.
"Talk about him likin' young girls, that's a gift from me," the track suggested.
"It is in this context in which such lyrics as 'Hey Drake, I’ve heard you prefer them young' must be assessed," wrote Judge Vargas.
"The similarity in the phrasing strongly indicates that this lyric is a direct callback to Drake's lyrics in the earlier release."
'An Affront to Artists'
Drake, whose legal name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not sue Lamar in the lawsuit.
His legal team alleged the label of launching "an effort to create a popular song" out of a track that made the "untrue claim that Drake is a convicted predator, and to suggest that the public should turn to extra-legal action in retaliation".
Ruling against Drake, the judge said listeners would not expect "accurate factual reporting" from a diss track "replete with profanity, insults, violent implications, and figurative and hyperbolic language."
She pointed out that the rapper himself had engaged in similar language, referencing a lyric in which the artist "strongly" implied that "his opponent is a spouse beater", and a separate instance where he "claims that he 'was told' that one of his rival’s sons may not be his biological offspring."
Concerning the track in question, Judge Vargas said: "Although apparent statements of fact may assume the character of statements of opinion... when made in public debate, intense arguments, or other circumstances in which an audience may expect the use of epithets, fiery rhetoric or exaggeration."
Responding to the dismissal, a UMG spokesperson said: "From the beginning, this case was an insult to all artists and their artistic freedom and should not have been filed."
"We are satisfied with the court's dismissal and are eager to continuing our partnership successfully promoting the artist’s work and supporting his career," the representative continued.
A representative for the musician said the artist intended to contest the ruling, "and we look forward to the Court of Appeals examining it".
Kendrick Lamar has not yet comment on the legal matter.